The ultimate test: watching this glorious sporting summer has given me a headache | Emma John
There is a crick in my neck, a rick in my back, and a permanent ache behind my eyes.A friend refuses to offer sympathy.“You did this to yourself,” she says as I pop paracetamol.Thousands of hours of medical research are ploughed into elite sport, but where are the studies into the physical and mental demands of keeping up with it?While winter may be fiercely programmed, it’s the multi-disciplinary bunfight of summer that is the ultimate test of a sports fan.Right when our diaries demand we’re at our most sociable, our most available, our most outdoors, the calendar loses all sense of perspective and dumps events on us like it’s trying to save them from a burning building.
We stand below, arms hopelessly full, desperately trying not to drop anything,The past fortnight has offered a pair of excellent, if contrasting, case studies,The first was the weekend of the Euros final; also the Lions’ crucial second Test against Australia and England’s critical fourth Test against India; also, my Norfolk friends’ silver wedding anniversary,They couldn’t have known, when they married 25 years ago, that their celebrations would clash with multiple major sporting events, but they wouldn’t have cared either: Nigel and Claire loathe sports, and don’t own a TV,A better person might have respected their life choices; a true friend would have left their phone behind on the scheduled Saturday morning beach walk.
My screen glowed like a tell-tale heart in my jacket pocket, one hand clutched around its silent stream of rugby union content.If humans were more advanced life forms, the information could have beamed up my arm direct to my optical cortex; instead, I had to keep stopping to roll up my trousers, take off my shoes, marvel at the view, and any other excuse to sneak a look at the screen.When the Lions were back within two points, I made my own 99 call: a tactical ice-cream purchase that allowed me to backmark the group and risk turning up the volume.It was low tide on the north Norfolk coast, and the 5G had given out by the time I was halfway to the water’s edge.The picture was frozen on a heavily pixelated scrum at the time I heard the winning try.
The return of phone signal near the dunes brought the news that India were nought for two in the cricket,Extreme circumstances are supposed to reveal your character,In my case, all it takes is a weekend in Norfolk with limited data coverage and a wifi-less bedroom,I think of myself as both a lover of the countryside and an excellent party guest,And yet when push came to shove, I wasted an entire afternoon ignoring the giant puffball mushrooms, hovering red kites and scuffling hedgerow pheasants around me, instead thumbing fruitlessly at an Old Trafford scorecard that refused to update.
The Euros final was the trickiest moment to negotiate: the anniversary couple had booked us in at a fancy wine bar, where the live jazz went on until 6pm.I positioned myself at the end of the table next to a football-loving friend, and we only got busted when someone moved the ice bucket in front of us and her phone fell over, screen-side up, to reveal Lauren James being subbed off.“Is the game going well?” someone asked.“No,” we replied.By extra time we were back at the house, where we sorry-notsorryed our way into the living room with a laptop.
The only three of us interested in the historic, nerve-shredding title defence tessellated our hips on to a two-person sofa and watched soundless images, while the rest of the guests sat opposite making determined conversation over our yelps, groans and explosive swears.It was, as someone noted, a room of two halves.If you think the above is ridiculous behaviour, firstly, you’re not wrong.Secondly, it only got worse last weekend.After the hijinks of Norfolk, an entire two days on the sofa with the rugby, cricket and Formula One all available on Sky Sports presented itself like a spa break.
Instead, the endless flicking back and forth – between Bundee Aki’s drops in Sydney, Lewis Hamilton’s qualifying woes in Hungary, and England’s rollercoaster ride at the Oval – brought on a tension headache so powerful and insistent I had to spend half of Sunday in bed, being soothed by the background burble of Test Match Special,In truth, I’ve been overdoing it since Wimbledon,It is both the blessing and the curse of the modern sporting fan to be able to have what we’ve always wanted: all the coverage, all the time,If the thing you love is available to you, who but an ingrate would cut themselves off?The ironical coda to all this was the knife-edge finish to the England’s Test series on Monday morning, right when most of us were back to work,Foolishly, I had arranged an unalterable hour-long meeting in the centre of London at 11am, so I recorded the game’s climax to watch on delay, and determined to get myself home without discovering the score.
It took every ounce of concentration to fight my own muscle memory and resist the repeated urge to reach for my phone,Shuffling my way through the underground, I stared at my shoes like a teenager, terrified to look up in case I crossed paths with any fans on their way back from the ground,I was only a stop away when the train briefly surfaced and I heard the ping of a text,I’ve never understood, before, why Orpheus checked on Eurydice,Suddenly there I was, acting on instinct, fatally turning my head.
“2-2 the only fair result!” my eyes took in, as the train plunged back into a tunnel,Oh well,Maybe it was time for an intervention,These last two weeks have not been good for me,
Does Jeremy Corbyn know his potatoes? | Brief letters
“Is this government going to put the nail in the coffin of the joy of digging ground for potatoes on a cold, wet February Sunday afternoon?” Jeremy Corbyn wrote in the Daily Telegraph (Jeremy Corbyn warns rules on council asset sales threaten allotments, 5 August). Never trust a man who can’t tell his parsnips from his potatoes: leaving spuds in the ground till February means they’ll have been spoiled by frost or rot. And I say this as a lifelong Labour voter.Dariel FrancisTunbridge Wells, Kent A key point not covered in your article (YouTube most popular first TV destination for children, Ofcom finds, 30 July) is the extent to which schools, particularly primaries, use YouTube, from movement breaks to educational programmes and quiet-time cartoons before home time.Cat Mehta Weybridge, Surrey While I enjoyed his review of Millet at the National Gallery (5 August), I do wonder about Jonathan Jones’s inner life
Starmer declines to rule out election pledge-breaking tax rises in budget after claim Treasury must fill £40bn deficit – as it happened
Keir Starmer has defended the government’s handling of the economy, but declined to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget.Speaking to broadcasters on a visit to Milton Keynes today, he also claimed that he did not “recognise” some of the figures in a thinktank report claiming that in the budget in the autumn Rachel Reeves will need to address a deficit of more than £40bn.The National Institute of Economic and Social Research argues that tax rises will be needed to plug the hole in government finances. (See 9.39am
Labour accused of using Jimmy Savile’s name to ‘bait’ Nigel Farage
Labour’s use of Jimmy Savile’s “toxic” name appeared to be an attempt to “deliberately bait” Nigel Farage and would distress survivors of child sexual abuse, lawyers for victims of the late TV presenter has said.Alan Collins, the head of the abuse team at Hugh James solicitors, said it was “concerning” to see Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister, and others use Savile’s name to try to “score points over political opponents”.Labour has accused Farage and Reform UK of being “on the side of predators like Savile” by opposing the Online Safety Act.Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, was the first minister to make the comparison when he told Sky News last week: “I see that Nigel Farage is already saying that he’s going to overturn these laws. So you know, we have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence
Keir Starmer plays down warnings that taxes will have to be raised in autumn
Keir Starmer has sought to play down warnings that the government will be forced to raise taxes this autumn and said some of the figures being circulated “are not ones I recognise”.The prime minister was responding to forecasts from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR), which projected a shortfall of up to £51bn in the public finances, given a number of factors had knocked the chancellor’s plans to stay within Whitehall spending limits, including higher debt interest payments and U-turns on welfare spending cuts.NIESR said “moderate but sustained” tax rises would be needed in the autumn budget for Rachel Reeves to overcome the deficit of £41.2bn and then restore a near £10bn buffer in the current budget or be forced to use harsh cost-cutting measures in the autumn statement.Speaking during a visit to Milton Keynes, Starmer disagreed with the economists’ warnings
Rachel Reeves needs to put up taxes to cover £40bn deficit, thinktank says
Rachel Reeves will need to raise taxes to close a government spending gap that is on course to reach more than £40bn after a slowdown in economic growth and higher-than-expected inflation, according to a leading thinktank.In a blow to Labour’s hopes of balancing the books without breaking manifesto commitments ruling out personal tax rises, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) said a number of factors would knock off course the chancellor’s plans to stay within Whitehall spending limits.These factors included headwinds from Donald Trump’s tariff war, higher debt interest payments and U-turns on welfare spending cuts.NIESR said “moderate but sustained” tax rises would be needed in the autumn budget for Reeves to overcome a deficit of £41.2bn and then restore a near £10bn buffer in the current budget, forcing the Treasury to raise more than £51bn from taxes, secure extra borrowing or use severe cost-cutting measures to find extra savings
Labour thinktank offers sponsorship packages to meet and influence ‘key policymakers’
A Labour thinktank has been offering sponsorship packages where businesses can meet and influence MPs and ministers, according to a report.The Labour Infrastructure Forum (LIF) has been offering companies the chance to sponsor events at which they can meet “key policymakers” in private and “shape the discussion”, the Times said.An LIF prospectus lists a set of sponsorship packages on offer for companies, including a £7,850 deal for a “private breakfast/dinner roundtable with an influential Labour figure”.Other deals on offer include £11,750 for a “parliamentary panel event with key policymakers”, and between £21,500 and £30,000 for a “Westminster drinks reception”. The prices are not inclusive of VAT
Bank of England cuts interest rates as it warns food costs could push inflation to 4%
Thousands of hotels in Europe to sue Booking.com over ‘abusive’ practices
Garmin Forerunner 570 review: running watch stumbles just short of greatness
Trump announces Apple’s plan to invest $100bn in US manufacturing
The NHL preached inclusion. So why has it got into bed with Donald Trump?
The Hundred can be a ‘multibillion-dollar product’ like the IPL, says Tech Titans chief