The bond market is wrong. Reeves should not cut welfare to placate the City | Richard Partington
There are less than three weeks to go.In the lengthy wait for Rachel Reeves’s autumn budget, the chancellor will on Monday get the first verdict on her tax and spending plans from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).After the interminable weeks of speculation, kite flying and bad headlines, this moment matters.Has the widely anticipated fiscal gap of up to £30bn been filled? At what cost for growth, inflation, and living standards?Heading into this moment the chancellor can take some heart.Gilt markets have rallied in recent weeks, bringing down the cost of government borrowing.
What the OBR thinks is one thing.But the bond market is the intimidator-in-chief of governments the world over.The backdrop in global markets has helped in recent weeks.Falling US borrowing costs are a tailwind.Reeves has also succeeded in rolling the pitch for jittery investors in UK government debt by talking up her commitment to fiscal discipline.
The negative space framing the chancellor’s otherwise vacuous speech last week was the acknowledgment that taxes will rise, spending could be cut.Keeping the bond market on side is important.There are plenty of voices arguing the dangers are overplayed.But Reeves is right to say there is “nothing progressive, nothing Labour” about risking a bond market reaction that would drive up borrowing costs.However, there is a fine line to tread.
Bending to the bond market view is no risk-free bet.In the City, investors are looking for Reeves to be tough on public spending in particular.Doing so would send out the strongest message of budget discipline to the bond market – far more than a manifesto-busting round of tax hikes.As debt market analysts at Barclays put it last month: “Spending reform is now seen as a totemic issue by the market.” That Keir Starmer’s government foundered in its attempt to cut £5bn from welfare earlier this year was “a red flag from the perspective of the gilt market,” they said.
At the same time, bond investors worry big tax increases could torpedo Britain’s growth prospects.Doing so would lock the country in a debt-laden, low-growth doom loop.“The gilt market can see the more you’re sticking up taxes, the more that you’re trashing growth,” says Mark Dowding, the chief investment officer at the hedge fund RBC BlueBay.He would rather Reeves prevent a “culture of benefits dependency” from taking root by cutting welfare.“The tax burden is already historically high, and if spending continues to move on an upwards trajectory, you’re almost saying that taxes will need to continue to increase.
That doesn’t feel sustainable.”Reeves will need to be alive to the risk that tax rises could hit growth – the government’s No 1 mission.The Bank of England could take some of the slack by cutting rates.But it is a gamble.A slowdown would sap tax receipts, living standards.
Efforts to balance the books and Labour’s re-election chances would take a serious knock.However, the welfare-cutting bias in the City is simplistic, misplaced, and could condemn Britain to a worse trajectory.”Cutting welfare might sound an attractive cost saver.Total spending in cash terms is rising at a dramatic rate: from roughly £300bn to about £370bn by the end of the decade – largely as a result of the pensions triple lock and rising disability and health-related benefit caseloads.Britain is an ageing and increasingly unwell nation, fuelled not just by simple demographic changes; but also an underperforming economy and crumbling public services.
A fifth of the population is of retirement age, and as life expectancy increases and the baby boomer generation reaches older age, these changes will only accelerate.The welfare bill is a reflection of this.Sign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningafter newsletter promotionAt any one time, the state makes benefit and pension payments to more than 24 million people.Pensioners get most of the money, with 13.1 million recipients.
Much of the rest goes to 10 million working-age adults, most through universal credit – where more than a third of claimants are in work,Despite these pressures, total welfare spending is projected to remain flat as a percentage of GDP up to the end of the decade,Tell this to the next person who says welfare spending is on an unsustainable path but holding the defence budget constant as a share of national income is a disaster,For all of the pressure on the state, overall working-age welfare spending is flat and similar to the levels in 2015,Cash spending on health-related benefits is rising, but as a share of GDP it is lower now than in the 1990s.
When push comes to shove, welfare cuts affect more people than might be immediately imagined in the othering narratives about welfare scroungers.Evidence shows health-related benefit cuts would drive up poverty, not employment.Meanwhile, taking money out of the pockets of vulnerable people would reduce spending in the economy.Raising taxes is not the only way to slow an economy to stall speed.Increasingly, there is recognition that Britain’s economic prospects have been undermined by the erosion of the country’s social safety net.
The debate at the last election was centred on boosting growth to fund public services and the welfare state.But this negates the point that the relationship between the two is symbiotic.The last decade and a half of austerity is proof enough.
Can Donald Trump really make an NFL team name its stadium after him?
That’s if a well-sourced report from ESPN is to be believed. The US president has apparently let it be known to the ownership group of the Washington Commanders that he wants the team’s new stadium, which is scheduled to open in 2030, to take his name. “It’s what the president wants, and it will probably happen,” a senior White House official told ESPN.Not quite. While the franchise was a dominant force in the 1980s, its last Super Bowl appearance came in the 1991 season
Carlos Alcaraz up and running at ATP Finals with win over Alex de Minaur
Carlos Alcaraz opened the ATP’s season-ending championships, and the battle for the year-end No 1 ranking, in ideal fashion as he confidently navigated a turbulent opening set before easing to a 7-6 (5), 6-2 win over the seventh seed, Alex de Minaur, in Turin.Alcaraz, the top seed, is attempting to win the ATP Finals for the first time and hold off Jannik Sinner to finish the season as the top-ranked player. Despite ceding significant ground to the Italian in recent weeks by losing to Cameron Norrie in his opening match at the Paris Masters, which Sinner won, Alcaraz still holds a clear advantage this week since the Italian is defending his title from last year. The Spaniard must win all three of his round-robin group stage matches or reach the final in order to secure the top ranking.Although this has been the best season of Alcaraz’s career, he still has much to prove on indoor hard courts where he has so far struggled to replicate his results on other surfaces
Rob Steen obituary
My friend Rob Steen, who has died of a heart attack aged 67, wrote about sport, particularly cricket, with passion and style.“He was the most irrepressible sports fan of us all,” said the Guardian rugby correspondent Rob Kitson.“He cared more about sports journalism than anyone I’ve met,” a lecturer at Brighton University, where Rob taught, told me.He was perhaps proudest of his contributions to the Guardian spanning, intermittently, from 1988 to 2006, his role as deputy sports editor of the Sunday Times in the mid-1990s, and his long relationships with Wisden Cricketer and Cricinfo.He also wrote accomplished biographies of David Gower (1995) and Desmond Haynes (1993) and, with Alastair McLellan, the groundbreaking 500-1 (2001), about the 1981 Headingley test
ATP Finals tennis: Carlos Alcaraz defeated Alex de Minaur – as it happened
Carlos Alcaraz began his bid for a first ATP Finals trophy with a 7-6 (5), 6-2 win over Australian Alex de Minaur in their round-robin clash in Turin on Sunday.Alcaraz won his opening ATP Finals match for the first time despite De Minaur’s battling display, where the Australian recovered from 4-1 down to force a tiebreak in the opening set before the Spaniard came out on top.The pair traded breaks of serve at the start of the second set, but Alcaraz broke twice more to again lead 4-1 and this time there was no comeback despite De Minaur’s valiant effort in the opening match of the Jimmy Connors Group.Alcaraz is on course to end the year as world number one, and in Turin he must either reach the final or sweep his round-robin matches to guarantee himself the year-end top spot for the second time. ReutersThat, then, is us, but fear not: we’ve plenty else for you, starting immediately
Can anyone challenge the Sinner-Alcaraz supremacy? ATP Finals will reveal all
Days before the grand finale of the ATP season in Turin, the Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner show had already begun. Although the two rivals are locked in battle to determine the year-end No 1 ranking, rumours swirled early on Friday morning that they were scheduled to train together. Sure enough, that afternoon they entered the stadium court side-by-side and they were greeted by deafening roars from a significant crowd.The practice set that followed garnered as much attention as many matches this year. Thousands of viewers tuned in to watch the live stream, then highlights were swiftly available afterwards
America’s men’s grand slam drought is not Taylor Fritz’s burden to carry
Back at the ATP finals one year after reaching the last hurdle, Fritz remains a top-five talent. It’s a reminder that a certain major-title drought is not his burden to bearI would like to have some words with ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler about what he said after Novak Djokovic beat Taylor Fritz, for the 11th straight time, in the US Open quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is American, Fowler is American – and sports often lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of disappointment was appropriate. Instead, Fowler invoked the continued drought of American men at the majors: none of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament
Seth Meyers: ‘Trump has no idea what regular people are going through and he doesn’t care’
Seth Meyers on Mamdani’s win: ‘The kind of energy Democrats have been desperately seeking for years’
Garden shed of vaccine pioneer Edward Jenner added to heritage at risk register
Miss Piggy movie on way from Jennifer Lawrence, Emma Stone and Cole Escola
Colbert on Pelosi calling Trump a vile creature: ‘You know who agrees? Most Americans’
De Niro to JLaw: should celebrities be expected to speak out against Trump?