Ducking annoying: why has iPhone’s autocorrect function gone haywire?

1 day ago

Don’t worry, you’re not going mad.If you feel the autocorrect on your iPhone has gone haywire recently – inexplicably correcting words such as “come” to “coke” and “winter” to “w Inter” – then you are not the only one.Judging by comments online, hundreds of internet sleuths feel the same way, with some fearing it will never be solved.Apple released its latest operating system, iOS 26, in September.About a month later, conspiracy theories abound, and a video purporting to show an iPhone keyboard changing a user’s spelling of the word “thumb” to “thjmb” has racked up more than 9m views.

“There’s a lot of different forms of autocorrect,” said Jan Pedersen, a statistician who did pioneering work on autocorrect for Microsoft,“It’s a little hard to know what technology people are actually employing to do their prediction, because it’s all underneath the surface,”One of the godfathers of autocorrect has said those waiting for an answer might never know just how this new change works – especially considering who is behind it,Kenneth Church, a computational linguist who helped to pioneer some of the earliest approaches to autocorrect in the 1990s, said: “What Apple does is always a deep, dark secret,And Apple is better at keeping secrets than most companies.

”The internet has been rumbling about autocorrect for the past few years, since even before iOS 26.But there is at least one concrete difference between what autocorrect is now and what it was several years ago: artificial intelligence, or what Apple termed, in its release of iOS 17, an “on-device machine learning language model” that would learn from its users.The problem is, this could mean a lot of different things.In response to a query from the Guardian, Apple said it had updated autocorrect over the years with the latest technologies, and that autocorrect was now an on-device language model.They said that the keyboard issue in the video was not related to autocorrect.

Autocorrect is a development on an earlier technology: spellchecking.Spellchecking started in roughly the 1970s, and included an early command in Unix – an operating system – that would list all the misspelled words in a given file of text.This was straightforward: compare each word in a document with a dictionary, and tell a user if one does not appear.“One of the first things I did at Bell Labs was acquire the rights to British dictionaries,” said Church, who used these for his early work in autocorrect and for speech-synthesis programs.Autocorrecting a word – that is, suggesting in real time that a user might have meant “their” as opposed to “thier” – is far harder.

It involves maths: the computer has to decide, statistically, if by “graff” you were more likely referring to a giraffe – only two letters off – or a homophone, such as “graph”.In advanced cases, autocorrect also has to decide if a real English word you’ve used is actually appropriate for context, or if you probably meant that your teenage son was good at “math” and not “meth”.Up until a few years ago, the state-of-the-art technologywas n-grams, a system that worked so well most people took it for granted – except when it seemed unable to recognise less-common names, prudishly replaced expletives with unsatisfying alternatives (something which can be ducking annoying) or apocryphally changed sentences such as “delivered a baby in a cab” to “devoured a baby in a cab.”Sign up to TechScapeA weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our livesafter newsletter promotionPut simply, n-grams are a very basic version of modern LLMs such as ChatGPT.They make statistical predictions on what you’re likely to say based on what you’ve said before and how most people complete the sentence you’ve begun.

Different engineering strategies affect what data an n-gram autocorrect takes in, says Church,But they are state-of-the-art no longer; we’re in the AI era,Apple’s new offering, a “transformer language model”, implies a technology that is more complex than old autocorrect, says Pedersen,A transformer is one of the key advances that underpins models such as ChatGPT and Gemini – it makes these models more sophisticated in responding to human queries,What this means for new autocorrect is less clear.

Pedersen says that whatever Apple has implemented, it is likely to be far smaller than familiar AI models – otherwise it could not run on a phone,But crucially, it is likely to be far harder to understand what is going wrong in new autocorrect than in previous models, because of the challenges of interpreting AI,“There’s this whole area of explainability, interpretability, where people want to understand how stuff works,” said Church,“With the older methods, you can actually get an answer to what’s going on,The latest, greatest stuff is kind of like magic.

It works a lot better than the older stuff,But when it goes, it’s really bad,” This article was amended on 1 November 2025,Unix is an operating system, not a coding language,

recentSee all

Delivery firm DPD accused of ‘revenge’ sacking drivers who criticised pay cuts

The delivery firm DPD has been accused of “revenge” sackings after workers spoke out against a plan to cut thousands of pounds from their earnings, including their Christmas bonus.The company, which reported pre-tax profits of nearly £200m last year and plays a significant role in the festive rush to have gifts and parcels delivered, has even threatened to withhold money from some staff to pay for the cost of replacing them, the Guardian has learned.DPD confirmed it had dismissed workers after an estimated 1,500 self-employed drivers chose not to take on any work for a three-day period in protest at the plans.It emerged earlier this month that the company had told workers it planned to cut 65p from the rate it pays for most of its deliveries on 29 September.Drivers said the cut, which came to as much as £25 a day, and the loss of a £500 Christmas bonus, was likely to add up to more than £6,000 a year for each worker – and as much as £8,000 for those who take on a lot more deliveries over Christmas

about 15 hours ago

The London consensus is a timely challenge to Trump’s isolationism | Phillip Inman

What replaces neoliberal capitalism is a question at the forefront of Donald Trump’s mind every day.The US president has never much liked those elements of the Washington consensus that celebrate free markets and liberal trade, as we have come to see in both his presidencies.Trump can happily accept the neoliberal agenda when it means privatising government agencies and commonly held assets. He is enthusiastic about deregulation and handing the private sector all the freedom it needs to exploit workers and resources to boost profits.But what Trump’s America First agenda cannot live with is tariff-free trade

about 16 hours ago

Knee-jerk corporate responses to data leaks protect brands like Qantas — but consumers are getting screwed

It’s become the playbook for big Australian companies that have customer data stolen in a cyber-attack: call in the lawyers and get a court to block anyone from accessing it.Qantas ran it after suffering a major cybersecurity attack that accessed the frequent flyer details of 5 million customers.The airline joined the long list of companies in Australia, dating back to the HWL Ebsworth breach in 2023, to go to the New South Wals supreme court to obtain an injunction against “persons unknown” – banning the hackers (and anyone else) from accessing or using the data under threat of prosecution.Of course, it didn’t stop hackers leaking the customer data on the dark web a few months later.But it might have come as a surprise when the ID protection company Equifax this month began alerting Qantas customers that their data had been leaked – since access to the data was supposedly banned