Thames Water tried to make MP pay its legal fees of up to £1,400 an hour
Thames Water argued that an MP should be forced to pay its hefty legal costs after he represented the interests of the British public in court, a move he described as “retaliation” for pushing for government control of the crisis-hit utility, the Guardian can reveal,The UK’s highest court this week rejected Thames Water’s arguments that the Liberal Democrat MP Charlie Maynard should pay legal fees as high as £1,400 per hour,Britain’s biggest water company has been on the verge of collapse for several years as it struggles under the weight of net debt of £17bn, built up over decades since privatisation,Thames Water’s effective owners have asked for 15 years of leniency from environmental fines from the government to try to recover,Maynard was granted unusual permission to represent the public interest in a court battle over an investor bailout for Thames Water.
The bailout was approved, but Maynard appealed, arguing that the company, which serves 16 million customers in London and south-east England, should be taken into temporary government control.Thames Water’s barristers argued that he should be made personally liable for its expensive legal fees to “deter” future appeals to the supreme court.The utility’s lenders, led by a group of hedge funds including the combative American firms Elliott Investment Management and Silver Point Capital, have effectively taken over the business.The lenders, who together manage assets in the billions of pounds, also backed Thames Water’s decision to pursue Maynard for costs.Maynard said he was relieved after facing the prospect of a ruinous bill, but that he believed Thames Water had carried out an act of retribution for arguing that the company should be put into a special administration regime (SAR) in the interests of billpayers who have no choice but to pay it for its services.
“I find it completely extraordinary,” he said.“What is the largest water company in the country doing trying to run an MP off the road, and saying they want to deter me and others from taking such actions?“What is the government doing letting a bunch of people run the largest water utility in the country and behave this way?”Cat Hobbs, the director of the campaign group We Own It, said Thames Water “wanted to silence debate about their state-sanctioned rip off – trying to punish the one MP who had the bravery to take them to court”.She added: “This absolutely disgusting behaviour from Thames Water is the strongest evidence yet of why the government must urgently take it into special administration right now.It’s truly chilling that Thames Water openly admitted it wanted to discourage future attempts to stand up for billpayers.”In legal submissions seen by the Guardian, Thames Water argued there was “no reason at all” that Maynard should not pay its costs for the appeal to the supreme court, saying he was “given a full opportunity to ventilate his concerns” in the lower courts.
The company said: “In light of the application’s lack of merit, the court is invited to infer that Mr Maynard made his application to try and disrupt the implementation of the plan and the subsequent restructuring in pursuit of his and his party’s political aim that Thames Water should be placed in special administration.This kind of conduct should be deterred.”Sign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningafter newsletter promotionPeople close to Thames Water and its lenders denied retaliation.They said the arguments were made on points of law in response to Maynard’s own submissions.The costs claimed by Thames Water were not detailed.
However, a statement of costs for the previous stage at the court of appeal, seen by the Guardian, detailed £2.3m in legal fees incurred by Thames Water.The huge bill – a small fraction of the total cost of the case – included fees of up to £1,400 per hour for partners of Linklaters, Thames Water’s solicitors, and a cumulative £812,000 for 141 hours’ work on the appeal alone from Tom Smith KC, Charlotte Cooke and Andrew Shaw, all barristers at South Square chambers.Any costs imposed on Maynard would have been very large for a single person to bear, but they are dwarfed by Thames Water’s spending of up to £15m a month on an army of lawyers, bankers, consultants and public relations advisers.A Thames Water spokesperson said “Mr Maynard was able to make submissions at both the high court and court of appeal without any liability for costs” and that all parties had to pay their own costs.
“We remain focused on putting Thames Water on to a more stable financial foundation as we seek a long-term solution to our financial resilience,” the spokesperson added.A spokesperson for Thames Water’s lenders said “no costs were pursued against Mr Maynard” in respect of the lenders’ legal fees.The spokesperson added: “An SAR will delay the complex turnaround and see taxpayers bear the risk and the billions of pounds it will cost to fix Thames Water, diverting limited funds from public sector spending priorities.”
’Tis the season for dubious TV adverts | Letters
The issues you highlighted in your editorial are real, but please don’t think that advertisers care about them (The Guardian view on the John Lewis Christmas ad: a modern story of fathers and sons, 7 November).This ad is a shameless attempt to make consumers think they are doing something worthwhile in buying overpriced gifts in a failing store that used to share its profits with staff but hasn’t paid them any bonus in the past few years.If anything, the relentless pressure of advertising (where the Christmas season starts earlier each year) only serves to pile more pressure on people who are struggling. The cynicism of these ads – pretending to care while desperately trying to trigger the Pavlovian Christmas shopping response – is truly depressing.Chris LinwardSalford Your editorial’s claim that the new John Lewis Christmas ad was “harking back to the 1990s” and evoked “a less complicated time to be a young man” would be news to anyone who remembers that time as the era of laddism and Loaded, and the underlying unease about men’s emotional lives as shown in novels such as Tim Lott’s White City Blue and Nick Hornby’s About a Boy
US markets struggle amid tech sell-off and economic uncertainty
Wall Street came under pressure on Thursday, enduring its worst day in a month as a sell-off of technology stocks intensified.After an extraordinary rally around hopes for artificial intelligence that propelled global stock markets to record highs, fears that tech firms are now overvalued loom large.Investors are also braced for the release of a batch of official data on the state of the US economy, amid heightened uncertainty over its strength during the federal government shutdown.The benchmark S&P 500 and the Dow Jones industrial average each closed down 1.7% in New York on Thursday, while the tech-focused Nasdaq Composite dropped 2
Thames Water tried to make MP pay its legal fees of up to £1,400 an hour
Thames Water argued that an MP should be forced to pay its hefty legal costs after he represented the interests of the British public in court, a move he described as “retaliation” for pushing for government control of the crisis-hit utility, the Guardian can reveal.The UK’s highest court this week rejected Thames Water’s arguments that the Liberal Democrat MP Charlie Maynard should pay legal fees as high as £1,400 per hour.Britain’s biggest water company has been on the verge of collapse for several years as it struggles under the weight of net debt of £17bn, built up over decades since privatisation. Thames Water’s effective owners have asked for 15 years of leniency from environmental fines from the government to try to recover.Maynard was granted unusual permission to represent the public interest in a court battle over an investor bailout for Thames Water
Pound falls and UK borrowing costs rise as Reeves ditches plans for income tax hike – as it happened
Time to recap…The pound has fallen and the price of UK government borrowing rose today as investors worry over how the Labour government plans to cover its fiscal shortfall in the upcoming budget.It was all in reaction to news that chancellor Rachel Reeves was backtracking on plans to hike income tax rates, in what would have resulted in breaking the party’s manifesto pledge.However, with just two weeks to go until the 26 November fiscal event, it has left investors scratching their heads over how the chancellor plans to raise funds in order to cover policies like increased defence spending or the likely scrapping of the two-child benefit cap.Meanwhile, the FTSE 100 not only suffered from those domestic jitters, but also global fears over an AI tech bubble, which continue to drag on US stocks on Wall Street.Investors are also worried that the Federal Reserve will hold off cutting interest rates in December, and the impact of delayed data on rate decisions, following the US government shutdown
Walmart CEO Doug McMillon to step down after more than a decade in role
Walmart’s CEO, Doug McMillon, will retire next year after more than a decade in charge of one of the world’s largest retailers.John Furner, the chain’s boss in the US, will succeed McMillion as the Bentonville, Arkansas-based grocery retailer’s global CEO after 31 January.Shares in Walmart fell about 3% during premarket trading.Walmart employs 2.1 million workers across the world, including about 1
‘Red cup rebellion’: striking Starbucks baristas urge customers to stay away
At a popular Starbucks in Brooklyn’s Clinton Hill, hundreds of people – including workers, union allies and community supporters – filled the sidewalks. In 40F (4.4C) weather, picketers held signs, marched, and chanted “What’s disgusting? Union-busting!” and “No contract, no coffee!”More than a thousand Starbucks workers across the US walked off the job on Thursday in over 40 cities, marking one of the largest coordinated actions yet by the rapidly growing union movement inside the world’s largest coffee chain.The strike, timed to coincide with the company’s lucrative “red cup day” festivities, is designed to pressure Starbucks back to the bargaining table after months of stalled contract negotiations.In Clinton Hill, many potential customers who stopped by for coffee were successfully deterred, choosing instead to support the strike
‘I really enjoyed it’: new RSC curriculum brings Shakespeare’s works to life in UK classrooms
Jon Stewart on government shutdown deal: ‘A world-class collapse by Democrats’
Old is M Night Shyamalan at his best: ambitious, abrasive and surprisingly poignant
‘Harlem has always been evolving’: inside the Studio Museum’s $160m new home
‘Most of it was the conga preset on Prince’s drum machine’: how Fine Young Cannibals made She Drives Me Crazy
Groundbreaking British Museum show set to challenge samurai myths