‘Red cup rebellion’: striking Starbucks baristas urge customers to stay away

A picture


At a popular Starbucks in Brooklyn’s Clinton Hill, hundreds of people – including workers, union allies and community supporters – filled the sidewalks.In 40F (4.4C) weather, picketers held signs, marched, and chanted “What’s disgusting? Union-busting!” and “No contract, no coffee!”More than a thousand Starbucks workers across the US walked off the job on Thursday in over 40 cities, marking one of the largest coordinated actions yet by the rapidly growing union movement inside the world’s largest coffee chain.The strike, timed to coincide with the company’s lucrative “red cup day” festivities, is designed to pressure Starbucks back to the bargaining table after months of stalled contract negotiations.In Clinton Hill, many potential customers who stopped by for coffee were successfully deterred, choosing instead to support the strike.

Those who chose to enter anyway were met with boos,Kaari Harsila, a 21-year-old shift supervisor at Starbucks and one of the lead organizers of the rally, said the strike was among their biggest actions yet,“We’re changing red cup day into the red cup rebellion to show Starbucks that we are serious about our demands,” she said,Workers were heartened by the response,“I think we have had a great turnout,” said Harsila.

“I am honestly so impressed by all of the support that we’re getting from the community and from people that come here and we are able to turn away.”More than half of potential customers, she estimated, refused to cross the picket line.Many of those protesting, she explained, were Starbucks workers, joined by “a bunch of allies that have come out from other unions” and local supporters.Inside the store, however, Harsila said Starbucks had brought in managers and higher-level supervisors to keep operations running.“They brought in the regional and the district manager to work because they are scared.

They don’t want to close it down.”Jacob Muldoon, 25, who previously worked at Starbucks and now works at the delivery giant UPS, said he came because he knows firsthand what a union can deliver.“I used to be a Starbucks worker as well … and I really understood those conditions, those early mornings, and that bad pay,” he said.“I know what a good union contract does.I saw my pay go up $8.

”Muldoon said the benefits he now receives at UPS, including free healthcare, could transform life for baristas.“I hope that they get the same kind of benefits like that, especially now with everything becoming so expensive.”“It’s looking good out here,” said Edwin Augustly, a 50-year-old member of Local 79 who currently works at John F Kennedy airport.“It’s pretty empty in the store right now.I live in the neighborhood, and this Starbucks is pretty much always full.

And today it’s not like that at all,”New York assembly member Claire Valdez, who previously chaired UAW Local 2110 at Columbia University, told workersthat their struggle resonated far beyond Starbucks,“I have lost count of the number of times I’ve been in a Starbucks picket line, and I’m never not proud to do it,” Valdez said,She praised baristas for fighting not only for themselves, but broader causes,“When you fight for your trans co-workers to have healthcare, that is everyone’s fight.

When you organize for Palestinian human rights, that is everyone’s fight.”Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, spoke about the struggle for fair pay.“Why is it that these gazillionaires think it is OK to nickel-and-dime baristas?” she asked.“We need to make sure that the people who do the work to make America what it is get treated with respect and dignity.”Starbucks Workers United announced last week that workers had voted to authorize an open-ended unfair labor practice (ULP) strike.

The union had spent months demanding that managers consider new proposals to improve staffing and pay, and resolve hundreds of ULP charges filed by the union against Starbucks throughout its organizing campaign,Since 2021, more than 650 Starbucks stores have unionized, despite pushback from management,Contract talks broke down earlier this year, after the union rejected Starbucks’ economic proposals,Starbucks said it was “disappointed” that Workers United had voted to strike, rather than continue bargaining, but insisted the “vast majority” of stores would be unaffected by the action,In Brooklyn, however, business certainly did seem affected, at least when it comes to the number of customers walking into the store on Lafayette Avenue.

For Harsila, seeing people choose to turn away from their daily Starbucks to support the union was inspiring, a sign of a successful strike.With three nearby stores already closed, the store had been “very busy” in recent months, she said, but not today.“I am so happy to say that it has been a lot slower than it has been in the previous days.”
politicsSee all
A picture

Trump’s targeting of alleged drug vessels strains UK-US intelligence ties

It is an intelligence relationship that predates even the Five Eyes: the UKUSA alliance that began, naturally enough, in secret in 1946. But this week the strain of trying to be the closest security ally to a freewheeling White House has begun to show.Britain, it emerged, had quietly suspended intelligence cooperation with the US in the Caribbean because London does not consider the deadly US military campaign against ships accused of drug trafficking to be in line with international law.That amounts to an extraordinary open fissure in a close working relationship at a time when the US is increasing its military buildup, expanding its controversial campaign in the region with an attempt to threaten Venezuela.“I’m not sure if there is a previous example of this happening in the public domain

A picture

Britons living abroad: tell us your views on UK politics today

The last decade in British politics has been marked by instability and fragmentation, with six prime ministers in ten years, and Nigel Farage’s Reform party now leading in the polls.A study this month from King’s College London and Ipsos found that 84 percent of people now say the UK feels divided, up from 74 percent in 2020.Polling on voter intention shows a fracturing of the political landscape as people abandon two-party politics – with Reform now averaging 31 percent, Labour 18 percent, the Conservatives 16 percent, Green Party 14 percent and Liberal Democrats 12 percent.We want to hear from Brits living abroad. How do you think UK politics has changed since you left the country? Does anything surprise you about events in the UK? How does living abroad shape your views on UK politics? Do you have concerns?You can tell us about viewing UK politics from abroad herePlease include as much detail as possible

A picture

Your Party receives ‘small portion’ of withheld supporters’ donations

The leftwing Your Party, set up by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, is embroiled in another public row over donations to the party.A statement from Corbyn along with Shockat Adam MP, Adnan Hussain MP, Ayoub Khan MP and Iqbal Mohamed MP states that hundreds of thousands of pounds were donated to the party “by supporters in good faith, but have since remained beyond its reach”, which they describe as being “extremely frustrating and disheartening”.It added a “small portion” of the funds was transferred to the party on Thursday which they said was “insufficient” and they will continue to pursue the immediate transfer of all the money donated.The statement posted on X by the independent alliance of MPs was not signed by Sultana and comes days after the Guardian reported on the former Labour MP and Corbyn’s quarrel over hundreds of thousands of pounds in donations.Sultana offered to transfer £600,000 from a company the party’s founders set up earlier this year, only to be rebuffed by allies of the former Labour leader who accused her of playing “political games” with supporters’ money

A picture

Starmer stands by McSweeney and says he has been ‘assured no briefings against ministers done from No 10’ – as it happened

Keir Starmer has said he “of course” retains full confidence in his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, PA Media reports.I will post the full quote shortly.At PMQs yesterday Starmer dodged a question about whether he had full confidence in McSweeney, although No 10 subsequently said he did.Some ministers and MPs want to see McSweeney sacked.We’re closing this blog now, here’s a summary of the day’s main developments:The prime minister has attempted to draw a line under the briefing row, saying he has “been assured that no briefing against ministers was done from No 10” and that he has “full confidence” in his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeneyWes Streeting, the health secretary, has said that he doesn’t know and doesn’t care whether Starmer is trying to identify the No 10 figure briefing against him

A picture

Starmer defies calls to sack chief of staff, claiming briefing didn’t come from No 10

Keir Starmer has attempted to draw a line under extraordinary briefings by his allies that No 10 feared Wes Streeting could launch a leadership coup, insisting he had been reassured it “didn’t come from Downing Street”.The prime minister gathered his senior staff to stress that briefings against cabinet ministers were “unacceptable” after apologising to Streeting for what had happened on Wednesday.However, his spokesperson said Starmer also accepted assurances that No 10 staff had not briefed against Streeting and that he stood by his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney.Since the furore over No 10’s fears about a leadership challenge from Streeting, first revealed by the Guardian on Tuesday, there had been calls from Labour MPs for McSweeney’s resignation.One senior Labour source described McSweeney as “the great survivor” after the Downing Street gathering

A picture

Labour must accept that the two-party age is over and embrace PR | Letters

Andy Beckett suggests the case for proportional representation may become irresistible (Britain’s two-party politics is fragmenting: what unintended consequences await?, 6 November). The strength of the case is not in doubt; the issue is lack of political will to legislate. Perhaps there is more will now than ever, with results from the 2024 general election and wide-ranging Electoral Calculus forecasts pushing parties currently against proportional representation to reconsider.Labour’s position is clearly crucial. Based on the forecasts, PR offers Labour a hedge against a doomsday scenario of losing up to 90% of its seats